If it were a general pattern that “losers” were consistently able to attract beautiful women then as a result of this non-assortative pairing there would be no beautiful men or women. There are beautiful women because there were beautiful parents. When uglies marry and have children they produce ugly children. Beautiful people don’t just appear magically — they are produced by beautiful couples. The existence of beautiful men and woman contradicts your idea that those “not so well put together ( in terms of money, looks, social class etc) individual consistently get attractive women”. When the basis of attraction is wealth and cultural capital and an ugly man manages to reproduce with a beauty you get children like Alexa Ray Joel (not hideous but nowhere near as pretty as her mother). Now if Alexa pairs with a man as unattractive as her father the result will be a child as unatrractive as Billy Joel (or more so). My point is that beautiful children generally result from the mating of beautiful parents and this assortative mating contradicts your central proposition. Your understanding of philosophy of science, experiment design and epistemology is flawed: https://md.rappet.xyz/s/dnDMq79dM https://md.picasoft.net/s/ekEcTxd6r https://pad.koeln.ccc.de/s/jLG5Y-pjM https://pad.p2p.legal/s/Q6mLlrxmn https://codimd.avt-imt.de/s/FCzBN1hyg https://codimd.data-futures.org/s/2y3jR3iDfj https://codimd.mim-libre.fr/s/dDLy3AzXZ https://craigslist-personals.startring.nl/ https://craigslist-personals.linkupdate.nl/ https://craigslist-personals.webmastercity.nl/ https://craigslist-personals.azula.nl/ https://craigslist-personals.dutchindex.nl/ https://craigslist-personals.sellerconnect.de/ https://craigslist-personals.knaps.be/ https://craigslist-personals.hmcz.nl/