November 29, 2011 at 6:34 am Wow, the rationalization wheel is strong in this one!!! You basically wrote an entire post coming from the “prove a negative” or “argument of absense” position. Basically you’re challenging the challenger on whether they phrased or made the challenge correctly enough. It’s like duuuuuuuude, YOU GUYS are the ones making a claim. YOU NEED TO PROVE YOUR CLAIM. YOU GUYS NEED TO PROVE THAT SEDUCTION/ATTRACTION-MAKING EXISTS. You can into all these hamster-wheels running around trying to find faults with how the challenge was posed… but the point stands, NONE OF YOU HAS EVER PROVEN THAT THERE IS SUCH A THING AS “creating attraction” on a conscious, purposeful level. Reply AlekNovy says: November 29, 2011 at 6:43 am Notice how all your arguments come from the perspective of “it could exist, and it makes sense to me that you should be able to ‘create’ and ‘pump’ attraction, because I want it to be true”. https://md.rappet.xyz/s/dnDMq79dM https://md.picasoft.net/s/ekEcTxd6r https://pad.koeln.ccc.de/s/jLG5Y-pjM https://pad.p2p.legal/s/Q6mLlrxmn https://codimd.avt-imt.de/s/FCzBN1hyg https://codimd.data-futures.org/s/2y3jR3iDfj https://codimd.mim-libre.fr/s/dDLy3AzXZ https://craigslist-personals.startring.nl/ https://craigslist-personals.linkupdate.nl/ https://craigslist-personals.webmastercity.nl/ https://craigslist-personals.azula.nl/ https://craigslist-personals.dutchindex.nl/ https://craigslist-personals.sellerconnect.de/ https://craigslist-personals.knaps.be/ https://craigslist-personals.hmcz.nl/