November 28, 2011 at 5:06 pm As you see I didn’t even mention Suzi Malin in “Reality Check” tab, cause her work cannot be considered as scientific evidence. There are no numbers, data etc. It’s more intuitive. But if you are at least a little bit interested in facial features you will find her book really eye-opening! Now Dr Alvarez work and all other quoted in that section sure comply with the requirements of a scientific study. mikey says: November 29, 2011 at 6:11 am The reason I entered the piece about deductive v.s. inductive is because the admin previously gave an example of an invalid deductive argument as an allegory to observations about pua. His main aim being skepticism. …. Well , the thing about skepticism is it applies on some level to everything a posteriori. It applies to every science exempt mathematics. The rule of parsimony is synonym for Occam’s Razor …. Yes, i know “heuristic” …… lol … This is just straw man argumentation. I realize the rule of parsimony is fallible, otherwise I would have said it was a mathematical law. epistemology? Really? I would be….. shocked if you could give a definition of knowledge, to such detail that I couldn’t give a counter example. Please, don’t say knowledge is relative, that’s false, perception is , not knowledge, and don’t say J.T.B. … That’s just lame. I realize this is off topic… but you started it https://md.rappet.xyz/s/dnDMq79dM https://md.picasoft.net/s/ekEcTxd6r https://pad.koeln.ccc.de/s/jLG5Y-pjM https://pad.p2p.legal/s/Q6mLlrxmn https://codimd.avt-imt.de/s/FCzBN1hyg https://codimd.data-futures.org/s/2y3jR3iDfj https://codimd.mim-libre.fr/s/dDLy3AzXZ https://craigslist-personals.startring.nl/ https://craigslist-personals.linkupdate.nl/ https://craigslist-personals.webmastercity.nl/ https://craigslist-personals.azula.nl/ https://craigslist-personals.dutchindex.nl/ https://craigslist-personals.sellerconnect.de/ https://craigslist-personals.knaps.be/ https://craigslist-personals.hmcz.nl/